Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
This is a nice read - but note, n=1 (out of n=45). One thing I found interesting that the article didn't explain in detail, is the fact that the subject appeared to develop a severe allergic reaction to the booster. https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/26/moderna-vaccine-candidate-trial-participant-severe-reaction/ … 1/
That reaction could likely have been against the vaccine backbone (mRNA) or the immunogen expressed (SARS-CoV-2 spike protein). However, the reaction took several hours to develop, so presumably this would likely be against the spike protein? (which takes time to express) 2/
This is a small early study and the subject was in the 'high dose' group, but if the vaccine can lead to sensitization in the first shot, followed by a severe allergic reaction in response to the booster, then that needs very careful investigation. 3/
Combine this read with this really great reporting from Helen Branswell on some of the challenges getting a #COVID19 vaccine (fast). We'll get there, and I'm optimistic we can get one leading to sterilizing immunity, but it'll likely take (some) time.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/22/the-world-needs-covid-19-vaccines-it-may-also-be-overestimating-their-power/ …
4/
I find the premise of the title rather odd. How does his bad reaction merit any consideration for belief or disbelief in the vaccine?
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
