Three separate papers out today on DNA vaccines and natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Overall, I'm quite optimistic after seeing these results - especially from @InovioPharma: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16505-0 …
1/7
-
-
Combine this with the Yu et al. paper in
@ScienceMagazine comparing different DNA-based platforms in non-human primate models, showing that full-length S (same as INO-4800) appears to be the best immunogen and is protective: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/19/science.abc6284 … 4/7Deze collectie tonen -
Note, animals did not* develop sterilizing immunity - there was a ~3-log drop in virus titers after challenge in vaccinated animals vs controls. From the Chandrashekar et al. paper in
@ScienceMagazine we see a 5-log diff. after natural infection: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/19/science.abc4776 … 5/7Deze collectie tonen -
Seeing this data - and the MERS data - I'm optimistic that Inovio might have a shot at a viable DNA vaccine (which would be a first). Yes, we need trials, human data, challenge models, and know longevity of response, but it's early days. 6/7
Deze collectie tonen -
Does this mean we'll soon have a DNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine? Probably not - too many failure points to navigate and still too little data for an unproven platform, BUT, that would be my conclusion for any current vaccine candidate. Overall, I see this as encouraging news. 7/7
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.