This article on #coronavirus case fatality rate is spot on. Thanks for moving beyond a soundbite @juliaoftorontohttps://twitter.com/juliaoftoronto/status/1235601474618523651 …
-
Hm this was the point I was trying to make in the piece - maybe it wasn’t clear enough
I think those points are made, but the problem is that then a whole new set of problems are introduced - as many as you're trying to clarify. The NYT articles lays out the issues very well - and Adam has posted a lot of good threads on the issues with CFRs.
-
-
I’m puzzled. Can you point to specific errors or issues so we can correct/clarify as needed? The article explicitly states we won’t know CFR for a while bc of under-reporting cases, lag time to deaths, and also that regional variation is likely.
-
These are same points made in the Times article so I am not sure what the discrepancy is.
- Nog 8 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Isn’t the sheer number of severe cases the bigger concern than the >exact< CFR? We know it is bad; we know we’re not all going to die of it.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.