Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
There’s always been more than ample “capacity” in place, the issue was the narrowness in what was previously approved. That’s why this announcement is actually quite important: it addressed the most rate limiting issue in the US.
Yup, agreed - and yes, this announcement is very important to help resolve the issue. However, we are two months into the epidemic and making these decisions now is being very late to the game - plus what's described in the announcement still needs to be developed and implemented
*Immediately* after this announcement, SPHLs started up on the assays they already had in house—the effect was same day.https://www.mass.gov/news/statement-on-the-start-of-testing-by-the-massachusetts-state-public-health-laboratory-for …
... again, *immediately* being two months after the start of the epidemic. An additional problem is that while MA may be able to begin today (if indeed that's what happens - the statement doesn't say that), this is not true in most of the country.
Agreed this is way too late—from the outside looking in, my guess is that perhaps they assumed solely relying on the IRR mechanism for activating >50 SPHLs was going to work just fine in early Feb, and there wasnt a plan for when it didn’t.
Jon had some good background - written yesterday, but I only just saw it. Explains what's going on (and why this is really subpar...):https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/united-states-badly-bungled-coronavirus-testing-things-may-soon-improve …
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
