My guilty bioinformatics pleasure is using Geneious- it really is very good for messing around with viral genome sequences.
-
Deze collectie tonen
-
Als antwoord op @pathogenomenick
How does it compare to CLC genomics for bioinformatics work?
4 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @tayabsoomro
Haven't used that for years I'm afraid!
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @pathogenomenick @tayabsoomro
Fit different niches, IMHO. CLC is much better suited to complex NGS microbial workflows, but is correspondingly more expensive. Geneious is great as a convenient graphical front end for some lightweight bioinformatic exploration.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
This used to be true, but I actually think Geneious has that part covered too these days? Lots of good primary tools for assembly, mapping, cleaning, etc, followed by a suite of analysis tools. My main gripe with Geneious is that it crams everything into a SQL database...
1 antwoord 0 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks -
I haven't messed with it in a few versions, back when they introduced a rudimentary workflow engine. It's great for what it is. My view might have been tempered by the fact that I was stress testing it on larger genome assemblies and seeing how it handled metagenomic samples.
1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks
I haven’t actually tried workflows in Geneious, but they’re there. As soon as a workflow (or anything n>1) is involved, I switch to the terminal 
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.