Here we go again. [And the answer? No]. https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/is-ebola-evolving-into-a-more-deadly-virus …pic.twitter.com/abJ5vD2hAN
Deze collectie tonen
One could of course point out that with a case fatality rate hovering around 75%, becoming "more deadly" is kinda hard. Also, each human outbreak is a dead end for the virus.
-
-
In the article (and his new book) there is also a misunderstanding of 'wild types' and 'mutants' - they're meaningless designations. Importantly, the 'Makona strain' isn't some mutant strain that arose during the W. Africa epidemic - it's the name of the variant that started it.
Deze collectie tonen -
A couple of references to better understand the evolution of viruses (incl. Makona) during outbreaks. - Discussion/review of Ebola virus evolution: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19790 … - Naming of Makona: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/6/11/4760 … - General review on the topic:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-018-0296-2 …
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar.
-
If you want to really stretch the definition, sure. However, we have no reason to believe that's happening either - it's a very common mis-interpretation/understanding of the A82V studies.
- Nog 4 antwoorden
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.