Any chance you guys (and anyone else..is CB Pratt on here?) could put words around this to explain it to us mere mortals?
@arambaut @K_G_Andersen
#Ebola #DRC #sequencepic.twitter.com/hEXJsbKEZL
-
My worry is that these graphs are becoming popular largely because the software is (very) quick and easy to use. You just load an alignment and the graph’s made instantly. No hard decisions to be made. Curse those people that make easy software. This is why we have a command line
I suspect you're right, and here lies a *very* big problem - PopArt is *very* sensitive to the underlying alignment, which will require careful curation to get meaningful results. Specifically, it wrongly interprets missing data (e.g., it treats 'N' as a separate base).
-
-
Furthermore, you wouldn't be able to pick up data issues like you would with a tree - e.g., unusually long branches, wonky RTT plots, unusual clustering, low support values, etc. These can all be easily identified with a tree, but are near impossible to spot with networks.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.