Je kan informatie over je locatie aan je Tweets toevoegen, bijvoorbeeld je stad of exacte locatie, via het web en applicaties van derden. Je kan altijd de locatiegeschiedenis van je Tweets verwijderen. Meer informatie
I think it may be a mechanism that the virus has used to persist in the reservoir - sweeps through a population (roost?) and if it isn’t able to move on to another, then much later it can re-emerge from an older bat to infect all of the new naive bats that have been accumulating.
Yup, I think that's totally reasonable. I *do* wonder about the potential for an intermediary (amplifying? 'adapting'?) host too though - e.g., great apes. Could the virus create latency in bats more generally, but then bounce between species (prior to outbreaks?).
Were you able to specifically look at clocks within the current outbreak? I'm not sure data is available, but would be nice to see that the virus did indeed switch from latency (very slow rate) to a 'normal' EBOV rate (e.g., similar to rate estimated for MAKV during outbreak)
I don’t think it works like that. I think most of the time (in bats, humans whatever) it is replicating and transmitting normally. Many recovered hosts may have latent virus but most never establish another replicating lineage.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
.