1. Find your niche 2. Hire great people 3. Collaborate 4. Get on Twitter 5. Go to the pub with random people you met on Twitter I'll add: focus on team, not just individuals; build a website; take time off; be comfortable saying no; have fun.http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6402/618 …
-
-
-
Als antwoord op @skryazhi
No question it's hard - and takes a lot of time/effort (~10 in-person interviews >1yr before I had my first postdoc hires). #1, 3, 4, and 5 will help - and so will a website (I get >90% of applicants coming through website + Twitter).
1 antwoord 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @K_G_Andersen @skryazhi
Also, I focus almost exclusively on proven productivity when hiring - via letter(s), preprints, articles. Don't be lured by fancy-sounding school names - they mean nothing.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 6 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @K_G_Andersen
I agree that proven productivity is really key. However, it also seems that some people who apparently do well (but not spectacular) in grad school fail miserably during postdoc.
2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @skryazhi @K_G_Andersen
There are just as many who do the opposite and flourish as a postdoc after a mediocre output in PhD. There is no magic formula, and "fit" with your lab is very important. The most scientifically productive person will harm your progress overall if they are disruptive to your lab.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Guess my point could be summarized as "hire great people" may not mean hiring the most on-paper productive people. Number of papers on a CV coming out of PhD, for instance, may be influenced by ethnicity http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2017/04/minority-grad-students-less-likely-submit-work-publication … and genderhttp://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2017/02/women-miss-out-authorship-opportunities-early …
1 antwoord 1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Certainly don't disagree. "Proven productivity" isn't necessarily papers - that's why I mentioned letters (and by that I mean references, LOS's, cover letters, etc) and preprints - hiring just based on # of papers would likely be foolish.
1 antwoord 1 retweet 0 vind-ik-leuks
And, no -there's no magic formula, but I believe there's a formula that will allow you to pick significantly better than random - but that formula can be different from lab to lab. Also, totally agree about avoiding disruptive ppl - that was my point about focus on team, not ind.
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.