This has to be one of *the* most irresponsible press releases I have ever seen. Let me elaborate...https://twitter.com/EcoHealthNYC/status/1022567864656699392 …
-
-
5/ The distinction between species and strain is a very important one, because all previously discovered 'strains' of Ebola virus cause severe disease in humans.
Deze collectie tonen -
6/ In contrast, there are 'species' of Ebolavirus that are non-pathogenic in humans (e.g. Reston ebolavirus) with highly variable ability to cause disease/outbreaks in humans.
Deze collectie tonen -
7/ From the article - ""This is early stages of the findings," Jambai added, calling on the public to remain calm while awaiting further research.". Correct. So would it be possible to see some data before you hype your early findings?
Deze collectie tonen -
8/ ""As precautionary measures, people should refrain from eating bats," [..]." This is an absurd suggestion. This basically means we should all stop eating right now, because whatever we eat could be infected with the next deadly virus (but likely isn't..).
Deze collectie tonen -
Press release from the Sierra Leone MoHS: http://www.thesierraleonetelegraph.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Ministry-of-Health-Sierra-Leone-new-strain-of-Ebola-virus-found.pdf …
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Either would be a new genus, correct? (I think I'm misunderstanding you and am quite curious to know - thanks!)
-
Nope - genus (Ebolavirus) is above both species and strain. Presumably Bombali virus (it’s now clarified that it’s a new species - not strain) is in that genus. ‘Presumably’ because we don’t know if that’s accurate until we can see the data (defining a new species can be tricky)
- Nog 3 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.