Should face jail
-
-
-
Poster tweets under full name and should take a picture of his diploma. Debunked so many times. 1) Virology Journal is UK-based under BioMed Central 2) A 2005 SARS-CoV-1 - IN VITRO [i.e. bleach would work] study about Chloroquine NOT Hydroxychloroquinehttps://twitter.com/olejonbj/status/1321209454126338050?s=19 …
Citing 1 promising *IN VITRO* (bleach is too!) study in '05 ~year SARS-CoV-1 vanished, less contagious, more deadly
Deaths ≈ 811
NOT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
Vir. Journal:
«Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in _CELL CULTURE_»
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whats the point, they clearly cant read
-
They can't. Virology Journal being the official Journal of Dr. Fauci's NIH? Sorry but it's BioMed Central which is UK-based.https://twitter.com/olejonbj/status/1321209454126338050?s=19 …
Citing 1 promising *IN VITRO* (bleach is too!) study in '05 ~year SARS-CoV-1 vanished, less contagious, more deadly Deaths ≈ 811
NOT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
Vir. Journal:
«Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in _CELL CULTURE_»
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
BBBBB.......0..l.l oC..K s to the vaccine then!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're probably one of those thinking the 2009 H1N1 was much deadlier too? «A follow-up study done in Sept. 2010 showed that risk of serious illness resulting from 2009 H1N1 flu was no higher than that of the yearly seasonal flu» Source: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/186549 … And (counting):pic.twitter.com/AeLCLUJz2k
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Yup! Evil man he is
-
Virology Journal is an open-access peer-reviewed medical journal which is UK
and NOT under NIH.
«BioMed Central (BMC) is a UK-based, for-profit scientific open access publisher that produces over 250 scientific journals»
https://twitter.com/olejonbj/status/1321209454126338050?s=20 …
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/may/06/blog-posting/dont-fall-conspiracy-about-dr-anthony-fauci-hydrox/ …Citing 1 promising *IN VITRO* (bleach is too!) study in '05 ~year SARS-CoV-1 vanished, less contagious, more deadly Deaths ≈ 811
NOT HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
Vir. Journal:
«Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in _CELL CULTURE_»
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What you're posting here is what Dr Fauci said 15 years ago about the benefits of using hcq. Can't do that anymore, covid-19 is a novel coronavirus, and there is a lot of evidence hcq is not effective against that. If you're a real scientist, you should be ashamed.
-
@sickendun2death * It was Chloroquine * It was In Vitro (so bleach ✓) * No In Vivo trials as SARS-CoV-1 died out 2004-2005 It was o/c *indexed* by NIH, they run PubMed, Medicine's go-to search engine for God's sake. This "PhD" should know. The source, need I say more
+ pic.twitter.com/TZRaxXw2iO
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.