Keno Juechems

@KJuechems

Junior Research Fellow in Experimental Psychology, Oxford

Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @KJuechems

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @KJuechems

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    27. sij

    New preprint with Jan Balaguer, Bernhard Spitzer and now out on this topic: Why are our decisions sometimes “irrational”? Take the example below. Which lottery do you prefer in scenario 1? What about scenario 2? 1/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 27. sij

    Taken together, our results offer a new perspective on human subjective utility and probability functions: that they represent an optimal adaptation to computational constraints imposed by biology. 12/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 27. sij

    Our results confirmed that participants adapted optimally to this manipulation and that only the uncertain group exhibited the canonical probability weighting function: 11/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 27. sij

    In two experiments, we asked human participants to choose between two lotteries. We manipulated whether, after each choice, they received the expected value of their chosen lottery (certain feedback) or whether the lottery played out (uncertain feedback). 10/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 27. sij

    Our simulations make two key predictions: i) that human choices should fall within the optimal range for capacity limited agents and ii) that the probability weighting depends on feedback certainty. 9/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 27. sij

    We assume that humans seek to maximize reward whilst minimizing uncertainty and incorporate this into our optimization via the entropy of potential outcomes of a lottery. Thus equipped, our simulations fit empirical data quite well: 8/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 27. sij

    Making these assumptions alone reproduces the canonical subjective value function. In other words, this nonlinear function is optimal for noisy agents. However, one additional assumption is necessary to also reproduce the probability function…7/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 27. sij

    We ask under what constraints these canonical functions would be optimal. We start with two assumptions: (i) that humans wish to maximise their expected value, and (ii) that they have only finite computational precision, i.e. that decisions are noisy. 6/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 27. sij

    Descriptively, these functions fit empirical data well. But why should humans have evolved such peculiar, non-linear functions for representing probability and value? Here, we address this question as an optimization problem. 5/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 27. sij

    For example, a Nobel-prize winning economic theory proposes that the probability and value functions take the form shown below. 4/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 27. sij

    Economic models can account for this phenomenon if subjective estimates of value and probability are nonlinear transforms of their objective counterparts. 3/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 27. sij

    The expected values were simply rescaled by a constant factor between scenarios, so a rational agent should prefer the same option in each scenario. However, most people prefer A in scenario 1, but B in scenario 2. This is an example of an irrational preference reversal. 2/12

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    7. sij

    Our paper "On the information bottleneck theory of deep learning" has been republished (with small edits) in J Stat Mech ML special issue: A wonderful collaboration with @laika117 Artemy Kolchinsky

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. sij

    New pre-print on BiorXiv! Differential functional connectivity underlying asymmetric reward-related activity in human and non-human primates: . Many thanks to K Marche and M Rushworth

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. pro 2019.

    New preprint out! The culmination of many years of work with , , and others. A General Architecture for Modeling the Dynamics of Goal-Directed Motivation and Decision Making via

    Poništi
  16. 12. stu 2019.

    Excited to be in Paris for the OFC meeting! Could do without the torrential rain and hail, though...

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. stu 2019.

    How we differ in learning from experience shapes how we develop different values, beliefs and behaviours. See our paper lead by Daniel Schad examining a neural and computational basis for this .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. stu 2019.

    (Academically) there is nothing like seeing your first (scientific) love out there: Amygdala-Prefrontal Cortex connectivity in macaques and humans () now out in .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. stu 2019.

    Yet another awesome paper from ! We find decision biases previously found in humans by /; study how they arise from an attractor network model; make behav predictions from the model of NMDAR hypofunction; and test these pharmacologically.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. lis 2019.

    Our theory about the role of posterior parietal cortex in structure learning is now out in Progress in Neurobiology! with and

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·