Jussi Jylkkä

@JylkkaJussi

Adjunct professor of cognitive psychology, Åbo Akademi, Finland. Researcher in cognition and consciousness.

Turku, Suomi
Vrijeme pridruživanja: lipanj 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JylkkaJussi

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JylkkaJussi

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    20. kol 2019.

    Consciousness is a natural phenomenon that science can model, including what it feels like. The ”epistemic gap” is distinctness between a scientific model in the scientist’s mind and the modeled phenomenon.

    Poništi
  2. prije 5 sati

    It's extremely weird why research on executive functions (EF) so rarely mentions 's Global Workspace Theory. It is the only game in town as to what EF are from a cognitive neuroscientific perspective. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) They are functions of consciousness!

    Poništi
  3. prije 7 sati
    Poništi
  4. prije 7 sati
    Poništi
  5. prije 7 sati
    Poništi
  6. prije 13 sati

    Reading 's Consciousness and the Fundamental Reality (good book, although too metaphysical to my taste), I guess I might be a panprotopsychist, but without the Russellian notion of categoricals. So, just a physicalist? (Well, who likes labels anyway.)

    Poništi
  7. prije 14 sati

    New book from Dehaene! "We are unaware of our own unawareness—and, therefore, we are absolutely convinced that we have seen all there is to see." Attention is central in learning: it is the bottleneck that determines what enters consciousness and is processed more deeply.

    Poništi
  8. 2. velj

    Old post. Didn’t have time to discuss at length with . Whenever you’re ready. Join the dark side and you’ll reconcile panpsychism with neuroscience.

    Poništi
  9. 1. velj

    We’re categorically ignorant of anything beyond our consciousness. That explains the epistemic gap between experiences and their neural mechanisms.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij
    Poništi
  11. 30. sij

    There's a divide into subjectivists and objectivists in psychology. The former follow Descartes and start from the 1st person perspective, ignoring functions (e.g. IIT). The latter follow behaviorists, focus on functions and ignore subjectivity (e.g. GWT). We need a synthesis!

    Poništi
  12. 30. sij

    Onko populismia noudattaa virkamiesten liikennelaskelmiin perustuvaa faktapohjaista suunnitelmaa? Ei ole kohtuullista, että lapset joutuvat ylittämään päivittäin 4.000 auton liikennöimää tietä ilman suojatietä.

    Poništi
  13. 30. sij

    Loistavaa ! Mitä sanovat ? Saadaanko Itäharjun läpiajoralli viimein lopetettua, ennen kuin joku jää auton alle?

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Video naapurista tältä päivältä. Itäharjun turvallisuus ja liikennemäärät todellakin vaativat tekoja

    Poništi
  15. 29. sij

    Headlesness could help us understand the relationship between consciousness and neuroscience.

    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    "I believe in all religions" (Coltrane)

    Poništi
  17. 29. sij

    Consciousness is probably closely tied to life, i.e., self-sustaining living systems whose border to external world is determined by a Markov blanket. To find the "determining criterion" is the task of neuroscience/biology.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Euphrates — a japanese collaborative of artists, researchers, and designers led by Masahiko Sato at Keio University — has created an experimental short film that mesmerizingly follows the movement of a ballerina using a rotoscope animation method

    Poništi
  19. 29. sij

    Seeing consciousness as the weakly intrinsic (=observer-independent) nature of the NCC means that consciousness produces certain observations which can be modeled as "NCC" by external observers.

    Poništi
  20. 28. sij

    Schlick on whether merely experiencing an experience yields any knowledge about it. Put in this way, it's impossible: knowledge is always *about* something, whereas undergoing an experience is simply the *happening* of a process. This is close to zen philosophy.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    One of the dangers of demonizing your opponents is that you make it ethically as well cognitively difficult to change your mind.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·