An honest assessment of that scenario where Hillary won in 2016 has the house with a republican supermajority right now & the senate approaching in 2020. And a conservative republican leading the primary polling for potus. I remember how that worked with Bill Clinton.
-
-
-
Of course we’d have merrick garland instead of gorsuch and RBG May have retired instead of Kennedy. Besides judges, I see no negative in the “but Hillary situation”. And a lot of positives -like no tariffs and republicans investigating democrats instead of our current reality.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I feel like you've made extremely reasoned and thoughtful commentary throughout.
-
Twitter is no place for that.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Ovo je potencijalno osjetljiv multimedijski sadržaj. Saznajte višeHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hillary wouldn't have run up a trillion dollar a year deficit -- in a good economy -- and borrow money rather than collecting a fair share of taxes from corporations.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You’re the voice of reason. Thank you. The extremism on the spectrum of both parties is counter productive. We are gridlocked.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I’m sure you know Hillary is in no way close to socialism.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I didn't vote for either in 2016, but somehow I now think a Hillary presidency would have been far better than Trump, but the GOP would have dogged her mercilessly to ensure she failed.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.