Have you watched the B&W version yet?
-
-
-
I haven’t! Curious.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I hope so too. 1917 was great, though. Beautifully shot and Roger Deakins has some kind of superhuman ability for composition and photography.
-
i agree with you on the camera work, but personally there was very little need for another war film, but that’s just me.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I would enjoy watching the Academy, full of wealthy people with houses on top of hills, giving a standing ovation to this film.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
"It’s [1917] classicism with a veneer of radicalism (and thus the opposite of 'Little Women' a genuinely radical movie with a classical veneer." GREAT LINE Justin.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The father snapping at the end and stabbing the rich guy was totally unexpected, and a genius twist
-
He had it coming
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
We get SAG screeners. This was my favorite. It was fresh, you didn't know where the story was going to go and the actors were spot on. And it was fun. I hope it wins.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.