Opens profile photo
Follow
Click to Follow JustinBrookman
Justin Brookman
@JustinBrookman
Head of tech policy for Consumer Reports (), ex-, ex-, ex-NYAG, ex-BigLaw. Occasionally UVa sports too. Tweets are my own.
Washington, DCJoined April 2010

Justin Brookman’s Tweets

And as Ben points out, at least GoodRx can't even ask for consent. The FTC is imposing a blanket prohibition on sharing health data for ad targeting for the company going forward (which is the right policy anyway).
Quote Tweet
The @FTC's order against @GoodRx includes a flat-out ban against selling user health data to 3rd parties in the future. This is the kind of conduct-changing remedy that has been hard to obtain in past cases (and why unfairness can be such a powerful tool). twitter.com/benrossen/stat…
Show this thread
1
11
Show this thread
Punting everything to consent can be problematic if it just means blanket permissions in EULAs or annoying and confusing interstitials. But I suspect the FTC will have a high bar on what constitutes valid consent for selling or sharing health data.
1
7
Show this thread
The FTC also alleges sharing this data without permission was an "unfair" business practice under Section 5. The logic of this count applies beyond health data, and reflects a broader trend from the FTC and other regulators to cracking down on sharing data for targeted ads.
Image
1
8
Show this thread
Privacy people talk about the HIPAA cliff (or gap) --- medical providers have rules under HIPAA but apps and websites aren't covered. But the FTC is using other legal authorities to impose strict protections. To wit:
Image
Image
1
4
Show this thread
This case is really a huge deal. For years, we've read stories of health apps sharing data with G/FB/data brokers. With this case, the FTC is saying that apps sharing personal health data without explicit permission violates the Health Breach Notification Rule.
Quote Tweet
FTC enforcement action to bar GoodRx from sharing consumers’ sensitive health info for advertising: bit.ly/3HNmvUT /1
Show this thread
2
76
Show this thread
!!!
Quote Tweet
The FTC fined GoodRx today based on a story I broke at @ConsumerReports. We caught GoodRx secretly sending your prescription data to Facebook and Google. Now, the FTC says that’s illegal. For the first time, we may have real health privacy the US. gizmodo.com/ftc-fines-good
Show this thread
1
Sorry, to clarify, chat-is-unfair was brought under Section 5 (unfair and deceptive practices) not COPPA. I had just meant to distinguish the two separate complaints (one on special treatment of kids/teens, one on fraudulent billing practices).
Quote Tweet
Fortnite also appears to engaged in a number of more prosaic COPPA violations too, but chat-is-unfair is the most interesting part of the COPPA settlement. Well, that and the sheer amount of the fine.
Show this thread
2
Show this thread
Anyway, we've been asking IAB to reverse course on this for years now, so credit where credit is due: better late than never!
Quote Tweet
In which we urge @IAB to abandon its efforts to define ad tech data sharing as outside the scope of CCPA's protections. advocacy.consumerreports.org/wp-content/upl
Show this thread
Image
3
Show this thread
This would likely violate the California Consumer Privacy Act, as well as privacy laws in Connecticut and Colorado that go into effect next year.
Quote Tweet
NEW: Twitter has a plan to force you to opt in to personalized ads to continue using this app. @ZoeSchiffer and me in @platformer: platformer.news/p/twitters-ris
And it’s not just personalized ads that Twitter plans to require. The company is also considering forcing users to share their location, let Twitter share their data with its business partners, and use contact data phone numbers used in two-factor authentication for ad targeting purposes. (In May, Twitter paid a $150 million fine for doing this without obtaining users consent.)
2
14
Show this thread
Free speech unless you track oligarchs & billionaires. Takeaways: 1️⃣ Twitter is making policy decisions on the fly 2️⃣ In ways that align with Musk's well-known interests Yes this is exactly the critique Elon came in with.
Quote Tweet
It appears that all automated flight tracking accounts utilizing open source data from @ADSBexchange have been banned from Twitter, including @RUOligarchJets.
Show this thread
Image
Image
Image
Image
40
1,831
Show this thread
This is pretty obviously a pretextual policy they haven't thought through and couldn't possibly generally enforce. Think for ten seconds about all the ways we routinely share publicly available information that would reveal a person's location.
Quote Tweet
Update, Twitter has changed their policy on open source flight tracking- help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p “Under this policy, you can’t share the following types of private information, without the permission of the person who it belongs to:”
Show this thread
Image
36
784
Show this thread
So Tesla has diverted a bunch of its employees to Twitter and also Tesla's stock is down a lot beyond the market since Musk took over Twitter and why isn't there a lawsuit by Tesla shareholders alleging Musk is benefitting Twitter/himself at the expense of shareholders?
Image
39
1,041
He presumably hasn’t thought this all out, but does this mean “negative” tweets are yanked from chronological feeds (as implied by the third sentence) or just not amplified by the algorithm (as implied by the second sentence)?
Quote Tweet
New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach. Negative/hate tweets will be max deboosted & demonetized, so no ads or other revenue to Twitter. You won’t find the tweet unless you specifically seek it out, which is no different from rest of Internet.
Show this thread
3
NEW from : Our ambitious, crowd-sourced Fight for Fair Internet project analyzed more than 22,000 bills and found that complex pricing and arbitrary, mandatory junk fees make it hard for consumers to understand the true cost of broadband.
1
10
Show this thread