I think that what you are calling facts are nothing more than strong beliefs. Or do you have a different definition?
-
-
-
Facts are things that have been proven beliefs are not necessarily that. However facts can be tricky, in the sense that can be probabilistic. But there are clear cases of beliefs that do not follow the law of physics or statistical regularities and still drive behaviour
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Depends on the context. The less noisy one will get higher weight to drive a more robust behaviour. One single experiment, even if it directly addresses this question, can’t be generalized to all.
-
Not sure is that simple. Outside the lab the definition of context becomes ambiguous, particularly when considering internal states. But there are experiments in social psychology that may have a wider scope compared to the ones we do in the lab. I would like to know about those
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
There’s work on how the introduction of new facts (or falsehoods) interacts with prior beliefs.https://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe
-
This is fabulous. Maya Angelou summarizes it best: people will not remember what you say or do but they will remember how you made them feel.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Perhaps the answer lies in 'behavioral economics'. There are many instances where people have systematic biases that deviate from predictions of the classical *economics* viewpoint that people make rational decisions. A nice book is "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.