There was more measles in the world in 2000. Why wasn't there more measles in the US back then? We were near historic lows...
-
-
-
It’s clearly a complex picture and highly connected community vulnerability plays a role. But there’s also a lot of people advancing single cause assumption which is not true.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Refreshing indeed! Great article, but will people believe it? Some days it seems that anti-antivax rhetoric is as evidence-resistant as antivax arguments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmmm what’s going on with that ~6% of Venezuelans?: ‘Ninety-three percent agree that “vaccines are safe” while 99 percent agree that vaccines are important for children.’
-
Suggests that most support vaccination but some respondents may not want to be too categorical, knowing vaccines do carry some small risks. Also always a small % against vaccination. Maybe here it’s 1%.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I know - I just know - there is a joke about survival in here somewhere...pic.twitter.com/MyZmLJLBqs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s not necessarily that it is growing. But antivaxxers are concentrated in small areas. Hence the most measles cases in 20 years, with kids in the hospital and icu.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Respectfully disagree. I'm all 4 evid based discussion abt antivax impact-IMO related but separate emp q from AV GROWTH-but piece not helpful. Like his prior piece a few mos. back, loose w/stats, strawmen, & wrapped in Slate's "go for counterpt as clickbait" style.
@tarahaelleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.