And time to remember that there is nothing sacred about our primary system.
Just a reminder that Iowa and New Hampshire shouldn’t be first on our primary calendar. They aren’t reflective of our diversity, and it affects the issues that are debated. Time to change the calendar.
-
-
-
And I myself like
#RankedChoiceVoting - Nog 2 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Time to retire the concept of "first on our primary calendar." We don't need to go looking for the state which is the closest approximation of America's whole voting population, when we can just let the whole voting population vote together.
-
And the top 3 go to the convention!
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
We need to completely overhaul the primary process. I was so disheartened when
@SenWarren did not appear on my ballot.Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Time to abolish electoral college as well....
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Also any state not voting with handmarked paper ballots with public hand counting shouldn't be allowed to vote in federal elections.
-
Riiiight. Because tired elderly poll workers at the end of a long election day count more accurately than optical scanners.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
And shuffling the calendar would likely reduce corn subsidies. Win-win.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
At the very least, put the first four (Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina) on the same day. Those four combined have a more realistic reflection of the electorate at large.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.