2/ Women & men deserve respect. That includes not firing them for politely expressing ideas but rather arguing back: https://0bin.net/paste/pcfWrJTlpbH9z7x8#oxqwS7sU8ZvBvA+qmDDJC-/SSBD7GsUC/nmXoW0TfKH …
-
-
-
4/ The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respondhttp://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists-respond/ …
-
5/ "Shut up and think" while the taboo of the day may change the fate of workers under cognitive capitalism remains the same
#JamesDamorepic.twitter.com/RtIB5ZJHMS
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He wasn't censored! His ideas have been amplified - anyone can read his manifesto! Quit being a drama queen.
-
Well, not the journalists covering the memo, apparently.
-
Wasn't censored! Wasn't censored! Wasn't censored! Triggered
pic.twitter.com/h7UEnKkrSJ -
Did you read his manifesto?
-
Yes, I did read the memo.
-
Me too

-
I know you did cutie. Then he wasn't censored.
-
His "ideas" were rejected homies. Rejection and suppression are not the same things yall.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
By firing the guy who wrote the report claiming Google suppress diversity of opinion, Google have literally proved him right.
#GoogleGate - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No.Employers have no such obligation to "argue" with employees about opinions they have shared using employer assets.
-
Funny thing, Julian feels the same way.https://www.wired.com/2010/09/wikileaks-revolt/ …
-
Why am I not in the least surprised? What a snowflake.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.