-
-
-
If you don’t want women having abortions, then focus your energy on contraception, not harassing pregnant women
-
I’m not the one guilty of initiating or making morally bad decisions Julia...pic.twitter.com/pbDvplHcd0
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Outside Parliament where they make the law. You don’t have the right to harass someone having a legal medical procedure.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
It is harassment. And this new ruling proves it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
It's not free speech when there's an element of harassment involved & the clients using the clinic have report that is what they're experiencing. Clearly police agree on this matter, otherwise the order wouldn't have been granted. They can still take their free speech elsewhere.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 6 more replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One would think that there’s already laws concerning harassment. Oh, and you’re not “All for free speech” if you want to criminalise those who’s opinions differ from your own.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it's harassment, then why not arrest the guilty for harassment? It does seem that because it's not really harassment they've had to enforce a ban.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah, the old *free speech when it suits* argument.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Standing or sitting outside the clinic with signs making people think about the alternative is not harassment. This is a sad day for free speech and freedom of expression.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

