I don’t agree with Richard Littlejohn that a man & woman would necessarily raise a child better than a gay couple. But he is entitled to express his opinion in our free country, and his opinion is not homophobic. CenterParcs need to get a grip.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43093154 …
-
-
Well being told it's not normal - as implied by the headline is arguably hateful... It's not typical - but the LGBT people who chose to be parents are normal.
-
As I read it, that was also a comment on the transgender couple and the baby to be breastfed by a biological man. The use of the word normal is problematic as it could just mean usual/common or imply something not normal is wrong. That’s free for us to interpret.
-
Well, we're both educated people here and know what was really intended by that headline. It was meant to cause controversy, and it did. Some advertisers don't want to aline to that - which is their prerogative.
-
Littlejohn/Julia etc have controversy as their stock in trade. No controversy, no income. Hence all this.
-
Good point. Just wondering whether the controversy, particularly where Littlejohn is concerned was about issues facing his own ilk. It's always pointing fingers at the "other".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's really not up to you, as a straight woman, to say whether his views are hateful or not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lol, Littlejohn is not hateful!!??!! Regardless of the latest pile of homophobic crap he's written, he has a long and recorded history of being a rampant, hateful, small-minded, bigot, who smears and attacks everything he isn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Like “Easiest”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.