A lot of people said a lot of things that turned out to be lies didn’t they Julia.
-
-
-
Yep, Project Fear was terrible
-
But the Prime Minister is a she not a he. Keep up dear.
-
Try reading the actual words I wrote: “the THEN Prime Minister”, ie Cameron.
-
Liebe Julia. He couldn’t invoke article 50 because he’d quit. Now we can have the pointless and theoretical debate as to whether he could have done this the second the result was final. The courts clearly said nein.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Mr Cameron did say that he would invoke article 50 the day after a Brexit result...do you follow politics Martin?
-
He also said he'd stay on... Not very bright lad.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...and you believed that would happen, knowing there’s 40 years of Union/policies to disentangle...a woman of your education, really?
-
Silly. The 40 years of 'entanglement' you refer to will make our exit and a future trade deal EASIER and QUICKER, as our standards and regulations are already aligned with the EU's so UK companies won't have to alter their products to comply with EU regulations and standards.
-
Oh it’s all so simple I’m sure!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Spot on; the threat/promise of instantly triggering Article 50 made me even more excited and trembling with anticipation as I placed my cross in the Leave box. Sadly, the disappointment started less than 24 hours later. My only Bregret is that A50 wasn't triggered straight away.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jeremy Corbyn also insisted we should trigger Article 50 the day after the Referendum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is written down
@martin_lowe just read the Lisbon Treaty. Two years to reach agreements, or leave if non are forthcoming. Read it. -
Sigh. Someone else driving in the mental slow lane. Was it written on the ballot paper as JHB claimed it was? Yes or no?
-
I don't believe she claimed that at all. The conditions are laid down though.
-
So she didn't claim there was a date on the ballot paper. She's just stating that the present extension was not what was voted for.
-
The implication of her tweet is that leaving the EU had a timescale conjured up by her imagination - and this tantrum is a result of reality intervening into her cloud cuckoo land. No timeframe on the ballot paper = no basis for using the ballot to invoke an imagined timeframe.
-
Please read the Lisbon Treaty, it lays out the timescale for withdrawal, that is why she added the two years. Now because we delayed it's March 2019; still two years from Art 50.
-
The referendum didn’t say *when* A.50 had to be triggered. The sensible thing to do would have been to decide on Britain’s future position first, *then* trigger it - rather than May to have been railroaded into triggering it by our feral press & headbangers in her own Party.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.