And another thing. This video shows the skimpy dresses the women were “forced” to wear. I see women happily wearing far, far, FAR less on a night out every weekend.https://twitter.com/financialtimes/status/956244292812574720 …
-
-
correct I’m making an assumption about these women but that doesn’t mean it’s not reasonable. There may be exceptions.
-
I doubt that young women will choose to work insecure, low paid jobs at unsociable hours with low chance of career advancement
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How much were they paid, do we know? London is full of young women willing to take money from men for looking sexy and getting groped, what's the problem, it's actually the men who are being exploited.
-
150 - 200 quid apparently and this was compared to a waitresses wage on Sky News this morning.
-
£150 plus customary taxi home for 10 hours work...
-
I still think this is a smart company using male stupidity to get them to go all Alpha Male and show off with donations, what better way to encourage that than getting some pretty girls for them to show off too. It's the men who were being exploited here.
-
What company?
-
I was meaning the company that arranged the fund raising event. The organisation responsible for the hiring of "Hostesses". They were not waitresses.
-
They were not hired as hostesses, no need to disinhibit girls with alcohol if everyone knew what was expected up front.
-
Nobody was forced to drink. It's not an ideal job for most people and you wouldn't want your daughter to do it but shitty jobs exist elsewhere too. Some women prefer this work and can handle it.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, since when did financial security depend on having a job. What a ridiculous notion!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Black underwear under black dress. Well, on the assumption that nobody assumed they'd be forced to flash their knickers, how about the perfectly reasonable UV/bright lights and light-coloured underwear issue? *battens hatches*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just because they wear the uniform given to them does not mean they agree to being sexually harassed or assaulted, does it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing to prove it doesn’t...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.