I have to say on this occasion, I disagree. Being a hostess and being asked to dress nice for position is not an invitation.
-
-
-
What do you think they thought the job of “hostess” meant?
-
To me it means be welcoming, friendly and perhaps serve drinks or canapes from a tray. Being groped wouldn't cross my mind
-
Nope, that’s a waitress. They weren’t waitresses.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
They weren’t working in the catering industry. They were employed as hostesses. They knew the deal
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Read the article. The women were told in advance what the job involved. Anyone ever told you what knickers to wear to work?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What agency are you signed up to ? You are doing a Katie 'look at me ' number here
-
Because I couldn’t possibly hold the opinion I have given, could I?
-
You honestly think the job spec you describe exists ? Come on
-
That’s exactly what the agency told the women working at the event - but you’d already know that if you’d bothered to read the FT article, wouldn’t you?
-
No it literally didn't. It said men might get 'annoying'
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
yes it is totally, to close the club is beyond ridiculous. That’s like applying to work in the playboy club and getting upset because I have to wear a bunny costume
-
No because there were very strict rules about touching the bunny’s and fraternisation. They worked in a safe work space where they were not gropped
-
Except the bunnies had to have sex with Hefner. Apart from that.
-
Consensual
-
oh right, sure....powerful man.....dependent woman....consensual
-
When they have to compare the situation to the Playboy mansion to look half-decent, they're defending the indefensible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.