And don’t get me started on Gina Miller. She didn’t trust the result of the EU ref cos it was taken by The People, not MPs. Then her court case forced a vote by MPs. After they voted to trigger Art50 she now wants The People to have their say again. Hypocritical nonsense.https://twitter.com/juliahb1/status/951814904419377153 …
-
-
You, by suggesting her motives were anti democratic
-
Julia wasn't (or isn't) trying to silence Gina Miller, merely pointing out the latter's hypocrisy and contradictory logic.
-
Possibly two different things, but what contradictory logic do you refer to?
-
The case she took to court to secure sovereignty for parliament, and her now dismissal of same parliament in favour of the decision being passed to the people. I think the term is 'having your cake and eating it'.
-
She secured the sovereignty of parliament in perpetuity, and, as it should be representative of the citizens collective will, should that change the parliament will be obliged to change with it.Isnt that democratic?
-
I'm not making an argument about democracy. Simply suggesting that Gina Miller's position is either illogical or it has changed. The credibility problem for her is that, although undoubtedly intelligent, she's not good as masking her real intentions; to engineer a remain vote.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.