How can you justify R4 presenters who couldn’t hope to get an equivalent job elsewhere (there aren’t any), being given £600K of public money? Like the PM, they’re public servants
-
-
-
I don’t justify their pay. I justify the differentials in stars’ pay over non-stars’ pay.
-
Totally agree with that. But v few “stars” to compare with the great US anchors
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 6 more replies
-
-
-
There is no gender pay gap. https://youtu.be/QcDrE5YvqTs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why not cap all
#bbc "talent" (ha ha ha ha) salaries to 10% less than the PMs? In no way should they be paid more taxpayers money than the leader of the country. If they don't like it I'm sure they'll find someone else to cross their palms with vast quantities of silver. -
How can there be a gender pay gap? I'm not even sure how many genders there are these days
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pay them all a lot less, I say.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
After some late night attention Julia?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So is being paid £250k a year to make a few snide comments about
#POTUS every few days! WTF!@BBCJonSopelThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More pertinent is the pay gap between these clowns and their counterparts who work in commercial broadcasting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.