It is wrong to trust the jury. Juries of drivers let drivers off. "We've all driven recklessly". It's the ultimate conflict of interest.https://twitter.com/eatmychuddies/status/910968858621759488 …
-
-
You drive on the pavement illegally, you take a huge risk with other people's safety. He killed a child. He should welcome jail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those things are not the test for a Death by Careless Driving Conviction. Driving "below the standard of a careful and competent driver" is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't think driving into the pavement without adequately checking he wouldn't kill a child was reckless?
-
Hell, he even admitted to driving into the pavement, which is illegal - https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q387.htm …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He killed a little girl, the jury could not be sure he wasn't reckless. There is a difference.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People seem to be quicker to judge and call for harsher sentences in polls and the press than they do as jurors. Very consistently.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He was cycling on the public highway with an illegal cycle. The court decided that his earlier & immediate attitude was irresponsible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.