Well; as judges are there to interpret the law, and it was unlawful; clearly, yes!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Believe me there are many malicious claims bought to court, a small business always has to be one step in front
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Yes my wife unfairly dismissed 18 months ago 1200 when you are a wage down a lot to find we found it and won 5 figure payment no barrister
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It stops a lot of spurious claims
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Julia they didn't outlaw ET fees - they ruled they were unlawful and denied access to justice. Get your facts right.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's called the law Julia, what is there to discuss?? Oh forgot, you prefer persecution to fairness!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, it was unlawful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All fo welfare, won bedroom tax in tribunal but workers need free tribunals too, lots of injustice out there
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes! That's more than a months wages for me, give the little people a chance. Employers have it too good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Judges are wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No they're not, goverment need to appeal, isn't it "up to £1200"? just another gravy train for legal profession.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They've not outlawed it. They have ruled that as the law stands, the imposition of the fee is unlawful, which is not them outlawing it.
-
Then why is the change stopping with immediate effect and being refunded to those who paid?
-
Because the Supreme Court has ruled the imposition of the fees unlawful.
-
Then is HAS been outlawed. That's the way any average person would describe it.
-
No they have not outlawed it; they have ruled it unlawful so they have not outlawed anything.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.