I am aware of that. But why did they do that? Because they felt forced. Now the consequences are yours, all of them, like it or not.
-
-
No, I didn't say that. I was responding to the claim that "self-govt" is worth a Corbyn government, if that were the price.
-
Self govt is worth ANY govt. Democracy means the voters always get it right. By definition.
-
Again, nobody is disputing that. The point is: if you were faced, in 2016, with (a) no EU plus Corbyn or (b) EU plus Cameron, you'd pick (a)
-
Yes, I would. Because I want the British people ALONE to decide who rules them. If they elect Corbyn, so be it. Live with the consequences.
-
OK, fair enough. The idea that they can ALONE is absurd but that's a different fight. One for after breakfast. You know what breakfast means
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Had to feed a work experience kid last week who had no breakfast . Whole break room now voting for
@jeremycorbyn . Such silly people .Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.