Except they wouldn't actually improve, there would just be more managers, more bureaucracy...https://twitter.com/juliahb1/status/862419748289753089 …
We spend far less on our NHS than other western countries who have better outcomes.
-
-
People at front line of the NHS are very good. Above consultants, it's a very expensive Leftie job creation scheme with no tangible benefit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Answer is not to just throw £billions at the problem, the management is not up to the task of using I effectively. Same applies in LAs 2/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Julia, under New Labour, an extra £268 bill was spent in 10 years from '97. Result: 25% reduction in beds and double the admin staff. 1/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do they pay £35 for paperclips?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even less still if we deduct business rates paid by NHS to DCLG...!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Singapore spends only 4-5% GDP, has the best; USA spends 16-17% GDP, isn't the best. Outcomes are not wholly correlated spending
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But less than 8% GDP with an ageing population seems unsustainable, I agree
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.