As John Humphrys just asked Fallon on #Today: what IS the moral difference between killing children with barrel bombs or chemical weapons?
-
-
Jesus Julia, I thought you had a bit more savvy No evidence,and massive previous form from the rebels of set ups You will regret this stand
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
or... ISIS could be playing a clever game. I guess modern journalism and politics has never heard of a false flag event.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I tend to agree, but we all have such ideas.for example why is it considered worse to kill children than adults -some notion of 'innocence'?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bombs are not illegal. Chemical bombs are illegal ... that's the difference
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't the difference that you can target legitimate targets with bombs but you cannot target with chemical weapons? Everybody hit
-
Maybe you should ask the 200+ civillians killed in Mosul by US bomb strike? Bombs are not precision weapons.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Send them all to heaven with shiny cruise missiles that probably need replacing . Ask yourself Who gains most . ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok it's a civil war weapons get used - chemical weapons are illegal under any circumstances in international law it's not pedantry its law
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This can only lead to more uncertainty in the world, more soldiers killed, more upset in Syria, more aid and more refugees.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Someone who is winning a war,and then he decides to drop chemical weapons It's almost laughable You have let emotion rule this decision
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Would there be a difference if he used nuclear weapons? Some weapons worse than others
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It might not be him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Holy moly I agree with you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
We don't send people to prison without proof beyond reasonable doubt, yet US bombs are raining on Syria without the UN having proof of this?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Bollocks. Chemical weapons are banned precisely because they are entirely indiscriminate weapons of MASS destruction.
-
What about nuclear weapons why aren't they banned?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.