genuine question: did you attend a comp?
-
-
-
Replying to @deq451
I thought not. Not relevant to your argument but I find people's own experiences often inform their beliefs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
As you say, it's not relevant to the debate. What's belief got to do with anything?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deq451
I think if you'd ever sat in a classroom in a comp, as a bright kid, then you would understand. Mixed ability is just dumbing down.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
I did O level English with girls who could barely read, for god sake!
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
If u say so. But if there is no evidence to support your conjecture then those without your experience cannot be expected to agree
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deq451
the evidence is very clear in achievement of working class kids who do very well at 11 but just average at 16, after 5 yrs at comps.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
huge body of evidence of under-achievement of poorer kids at comps while better off kids do ok only because of their parents' input.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
at best, brighter kids will benefit at significant cost to the rest https://fullfact.org/education/grammar-schools-and-social-mobility-whats-evidence/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
no, it isn't bright kids damaging less bright kids. It's the removal of bright kids from comps that exposes poor teaching in comps
-
-
Replying to @JuliaHB1
Which is where you started. But that is also only an assertion, no?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.