A test case in reaching the wrong conclusion. For the nth time, grammar's don't improve outcomes in their cohort, make other schools worsehttps://twitter.com/JuliaHB1/status/831875784256143360 …
huge body of evidence of under-achievement of poorer kids at comps while better off kids do ok only because of their parents' input.
-
-
But that's not the same thing as claiming grammars ameliorate performance
-
it's not the same thing but it gives bright kid a better chance than being stuck in classrooms with kids only capable of C grades.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
at best, brighter kids will benefit at significant cost to the rest https://fullfact.org/education/grammar-schools-and-social-mobility-whats-evidence/ …
-
no, it isn't bright kids damaging less bright kids. It's the removal of bright kids from comps that exposes poor teaching in comps
-
Which is where you started. But that is also only an assertion, no?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.