comp and, in a few years, comp. Neither changes fact that the evidence seems to say grammars bad for social mobilityhttps://twitter.com/juliahb1/status/762556682488668160 …
-
-
Replying to @TomChivers
the evidence doesn't suggest anything of the sort.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
I believe it does, tho I'd gladly see data to contrary. Good for the (usually middle-class) kids who go, bad for rest who don't
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TomChivers
so it's hardly a surprise if the bright wc kids go on to become mc and then their mc kids are bright. Whether nature or nurture.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
that's not what I'm talking about. Numbers apparently show that poor kids in selective school regions are more likely to stay poor
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TomChivers @JuliaHB1
which would be my definition of reduced social mobility. Never seen any evidence to contrary but again happy to be corrected
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I understand that results for nearby comps go up in areas with grammars.But no evidence of what a new nationwide system would do
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.