The job of planning for Brexit should have been on the Prime Minister's "to do" list long before 23 June. That's what responsible govts do.
-
-
None of these are framed as "we could". P. 32 on immigration policy: "We make it easier..." Not, "we could..."
-
Hmmm. Over here in the U.S., if it isn't part of the words people vote on, it's not law nor policy
-
Did the vote turn the pro-brexit pundits into cabinet ministers somehow? I don't get the idea.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They are framed, being charitable, to be deceptive. If you were sold a product with words like that, you could sue
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I have been anti EU for a long time, wouldn't have changed my mind. But think campaign was awful.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
-
What mandate does Farage have to be so influential? One MP, sometime party leader.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"lets fund our nhs instead" - no ambiguity, brexit/BoZo PR agent
@ianbetteridge@blindcyclistspic.twitter.com/l9eRmcliwc
-
Seriously, if you can't see the massive intentional ambiguity there you should brush up your English
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.