50 people were murdered simply for being gay. I think we should all be angry about THAT, not about some contrived offence taken on a tv show
-
-
-
That was his point! He was angry you two tried to turn it into something else, question the murderers motives etc! It's BLATANT.
-
FFS, we didn't do that at all!
-
So what then was your point? Why were you doubting his motives, even if only a little?
-
neither of us doubted his motives at all. How bizarre
-
"some months ago...he may have been angered by other things in that time" Honestly have a crumb of dignity woman
-
Yes!! Her claims of not 'diluting' the facts are crumbling. She won't face them however.
#Coward
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
this was stated repeatedly by all three of us. Your point?
-
Julia, I watched the whole thing, it seemed like you palmed off whatever he had to say about it, it really did
-
And this was a direct attack on the LGBT community, that was the whole reason for it. Different from Bataclan, London n NY
-
yes, and no one denied that. Your point is?
-
My point is that you and the host shouted him down when he called it out as a homophobic attack
-
Then focused on a quote from a newspaper by someone else who's gay, when you'd already shouted down the gay guy sat next to you
-
No bloody wonder he walked out
- 3 more replies
-
-
-
about you, not him.Good journalists read the room. Be psychologically astute. Should have interviewed him.
-
what do you know about anything?
-
which bit are you referring to Julia?
-
I know that as member of the community that was targeted his anger should have been respected and allowed lead to that discussion
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@YouTube When you're made to apologise, this will all look so much funnier - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.