-
-
Replying to @pastachips1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @pastachips
@pastachips or maybe I think you'd be much safer if you didn't work in the sex trade at all?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pastachips
@pastachips plenty of ways to tackle the supply, agreed. I would support all of that. So why does that make me "horrible"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
molly smith Retweeted Julia Hartley-Brewer
@JuliaHB1 bc this https://twitter.com/juliahb1/status/669092014416334848 … implies that yr ok w/ women like me being assaulted while we wait for ~the solution~molly smith added,
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pastachips
@pastachips no, it really doesn't. It simply says that the solution to the risk of sex work is not to be a sex worker.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pastachips
@pastachips yes, we should deal with safety issues NOW. My original tweet was that it's not the SOLUTION. Do you understand the difference?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
molly smith Retweeted Ian Dunt
@JuliaHB1 so u replied to *an article about making sex workers* safer because .,. ?https://twitter.com/iandunt/status/669089481425817600 …molly smith added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@pastachips because I was debating the topic with Ian - something we regularly do. I tweet what and who I bloody well want to, thanks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
