@JuliaHB1 Are you saying that's what the tax credit hours rule says? Or is it in fact just wrong?
-
-
@JuliaHB1@jdportes@StrongerInNos Are they? Because not claiming a benefit isnt evidence. Many dont claim because its a cruel process. -
@Hossylass@JuliaHB1@StrongerInNos is correct. The non-working partner could be disabled (& indeed claiming eg lower rate DLA,, I think) -
@jdportes@Hossylass@StrongerInNos stats show 126k disabled claiming WTC, with 175k disabled children, a tiny fraction of total claimants -
@JuliaHB1@Hossylass But@StrongerInNos is correct, isn't he? Doesn't tell you non-working partner isn't disabled. -
@jdportes@Hossylass@StrongerInNos but it does tell you that the vast majority of the non-working partners are not, doesn't it? -
@JuliaHB1@Hossylass@StrongerInNos No. It doesn't. You're misunderstanding the rules again. Partner could be disabled & not be in stats.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@JuliaHB1 They don't. They tell you merely which *tax credits* awards include a disability element of *tax credits* -
@StrongerInNos yes, but you can't pretend it's reasonable to assume that most or all of those non-working adults are disabled. That's absurd -
@StrongerInNos So@JuliaHB1 has admitted you were right, and article's assertion was "unsubstantiated" (at best). Progress.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.