Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
JuliaHB1's profile
Julia Hartley-Brewer
Julia Hartley-Brewer
Julia Hartley-Brewer
Verified account
@JuliaHB1

Tweets

Julia Hartley-BrewerVerified account

@JuliaHB1

@talkRADIO Breakfast Show presenter 6.30am-10am Mon-Fri. Journalist, broadcaster, after-dinner speaker, awards host. Preferred pronoun: she/her imperial majesty

London
Joined January 2012

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet

      Jonathan Portes Retweeted Julia Hartley-Brewer

      In which @JuliaHB1 demonstrates she didn't bother to do the most basic research on tax credit rules before writing..https://twitter.com/JuliaHB1/status/630756714825056257 …

      Jonathan Portes added,

      Julia Hartley-BrewerVerified account @JuliaHB1
      Replying to @jdportes
      @jdportes @Rex_Oper absolutely nothing that disputes any of the facts I state in my article. Eg, husband working 16hrs, wife working 0hrs.
      4 replies 4 retweets 2 likes
    2. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @jdportes

      Apparently @jdportes doesn't like what I wrote about a Working Tax Credits so he claims I didn't do any research and don't know my topic.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JuliaHB1

      I simply pointed out that @JuliaHB1's tweet above is flat wrong. See https://www.gov.uk/working-tax-credit/eligibility … & she's too embarrassed to correct it..

      1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
    4. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @jdportes

      No, I am not embarrassed at all. I cannot correct something I did not get wrong. What do you think I got wrong? @jdportes

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JuliaHB1

      @JuliaHB1 Are you saying that's what the tax credit hours rule says? Or is it in fact just wrong?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @jdportes

      @jdportes I'm getting worried for you now. Are you having a brain freeze? What do you think on that govt site contradicts my article?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JuliaHB1

      @JuliaHB1 ?? It says quite clearly the hours requirement for a couple is 24 hours, doesn't it?

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @jdportes

      @jdportes I genuinely think you have lost it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JuliaHB1

      @jdportes where in my article have you spotted a factual error? If there is one, I will happily correct it.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JuliaHB1

      @JuliaHB1 Let's start with your tweet: "Eg, husband working 16hrs, wife working 0hrs.". That is wrong, isn't it?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @jdportes

      @jdportes no, your original claim was that my article was factually incorrect. It isn't. So now you've latched onto a tweet. Pathetic.

      8:32 AM - 10 Aug 2015
      • 1 Like
      • David Paxton
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JuliaHB1

          @JuliaHB1 OK, so belatedly you've admitted your tweet was wrong. Your article didn't mention the hours rule, because you didn't what it was

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @jdportes

          @jdportes Really?! You think I was a political editor for 10 years, my mum works at CAB & best friend at JobCentre, I spent 4 years ...

          3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JuliaHB1

          @JuliaHB1 "families where only one adult is in work and, despite being perfectly able-bodied, may only be working part-time." True or false?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @jdportes

          @jdportes TRUE!!!!!!!!!

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Michael O'Connor‏ @StrongerInNos 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JuliaHB1

          @JuliaHB1 @jdportes One thing that *is* factually incorrect (or as far I can see quite unsubstantiated...)pic.twitter.com/5ye88tSPa2

          5 replies 4 retweets 2 likes
        3. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @StrongerInNos

          @StrongerInNos ps. Feel free to check the stats yourself. I provide document info in the article. Google the doc and read it yourself!

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Michael O'Connor‏ @StrongerInNos 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JuliaHB1

          @JuliaHB1 1/2 I have a good knowledge of the stats. Nothing can be inferred about the general able-bodiedness of non-working partners.

          3 replies 5 retweets 3 likes
        5. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @StrongerInNos

          @StrongerInNos The stats break down by any household member (adult or child) claiming disability, sickness. These stats are for able-bodied.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        6. Hoss #ReachOverTheNoise #SwedishPixie‏ @Hossylass 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JuliaHB1

          @JuliaHB1 @jdportes @StrongerInNos Are they? Because not claiming a benefit isnt evidence. Many dont claim because its a cruel process.

          1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
        7. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @Hossylass

          @Hossylass @JuliaHB1 @StrongerInNos is correct. The non-working partner could be disabled (& indeed claiming eg lower rate DLA,, I think)

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        8. Julia Hartley-Brewer‏Verified account @JuliaHB1 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @jdportes

          @jdportes @Hossylass @StrongerInNos stats show 126k disabled claiming WTC, with 175k disabled children, a tiny fraction of total claimants

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Jonathan Portes‏ @jdportes 10 Aug 2015
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JuliaHB1

          @JuliaHB1 @Hossylass But @StrongerInNos is correct, isn't he? Doesn't tell you non-working partner isn't disabled.

          1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
        10. 2 more replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info