Where would someone stand legally if they bought a water cannon to fire at cyclists riding on pavements? #AskingForAFriend
-
-
Replying to @JuliaHB1
.
@JuliaHB1@london_cycling Before you do any more silly tweets, Julia, can you put two crosses on these graphs for mepic.twitter.com/EQGQWNEG0r
33 replies 47 retweets 94 likes -
Replying to @theJeremyVine
@theJeremyVine@JuliaHB1@london_cycling sounds like you're defending cyclists using pavements causing injuries as long they avoid killing.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mikepjba
@mikepjba@theJeremyVine@JuliaHB1@london No, he's pointing out that the risk of pedestrian injury on pavements is far greater from cars.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @IndieChris71
@IndieChris71@theJeremyVine@JuliaHB1@london Graph axis are Deaths: my point was he's avoiding huge No of Pedestrians injured by Cyclists.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikepjba
@mikepjba@theJeremyVine@JuliaHB1@london 'Huge no. of pedestrians injured by cyclists' - do you have stats to back that up?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @edwinspindrift
@edwinspindrift@IndieChris71@mikepjba it doesn't matter how many cars or bikes injure pedestrians on pavements: neither should be on them.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
@edwinspindrift @IndieChris71 @mikepjba what made up facts?!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.