@JuliaHB1 because that child is likely to be disadvantaged by living in a poorer home
-
-
Replying to @jessicaelgot
@jessicaelgot best way to get that child out of poverty is if mum isn't pregnant or has a baby and can get paid work to support her family1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jessicaelgot
@JuliaHB1 and then they get poorer. and this policy denies them a crucial bit extra. and more children grow up poorer.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessicaelgot
@jessicaelgot either way, requiring those parents to support their own children is more likely to help them out of poverty than benefits2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jessicaelgot
@jessicaelgot I think it's bizarre that you think it's kind/humane to effectively encourage people to make bad choices for their families!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessicaelgot
@jessicaelgot not attacking you, but I'm always amused by privately educated Guardian journos' patronising attitudes towards poor people.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
@JuliaHB1@jessicaelgot Oh Julia.. So private educated ppl shld not care abt poor ppl?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.