@JuliaHB1 just because there was a 'pause' (which itself is now being questioned) doesn't disprove long term global warming.
-
-
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal temperatures now close to zero and well within margin of error. How can you not question the theory when no model predicted2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal as patronising as your last tweets were, they're gloriously typical of this debate. I don't come to this debate with an agenda1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal@JuliaHB1 here is another article responding to the one Julia posted by the 97% author http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/may/28/wall-street-journal-denies-global-warming-consensus …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Louis_Akindele
@Louis_Akindele@sunny_hundal interesting, but you don't think The Guardian has a dog in this fight?!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal@Louis_Akindele of course they both have bias. But that's my point. There are TWO sides to this debate. Anyway, moving on...x2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHB1
@JuliaHB1@Louis_Akindele not for the scientists though. And I'm pointing to them, while you pointed to a WSJ editorial1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@sunny_hundal @Louis_Akindele no, I pointed to a newspaper report about actual evidence against the 97% claim. Big difference.
-
-
Replying to @JuliaHB1
@JuliaHB1@Louis_Akindele No, that was simply a comment piece not a news story, and in a paper that has a clear agenda1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.