@sunny_hundal they're quoting the same study... Which was disproved. It's called "peer review" and it is the basis of all good science.
-
-
Replying to @JuliaHB1
@sunny_hundal PS. I hate that we disagree on so much. Am such a big fan of yours.... X1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal all good scientists expect their theories to be questioned. No climate model predicted 18yr pause in warming so clearly issues1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal temperatures now close to zero and well within margin of error. How can you not question the theory when no model predicted2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal as patronising as your last tweets were, they're gloriously typical of this debate. I don't come to this debate with an agenda1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sunny_hundal
@sunny_hundal@JuliaHB1 here is another article responding to the one Julia posted by the 97% author http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/may/28/wall-street-journal-denies-global-warming-consensus …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Louis_Akindele @sunny_hundal interesting, but you don't think The Guardian has a dog in this fight?!
-
-
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.