Morning. I’ve written this for today’s Sunday Express about Harry and Meghan’s two-child nonsense.pic.twitter.com/frVHN72r1G
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I have. It's offensive dross. What a surprise!
Minor detail but she doesn’t seem to have referred to any science.
I'm sureJuia is a expert in vibrational excited states and dipole moments of heat absorbing gases.
It's dreadful
It really is though.
wouldn’t look out of place in @vizcomic
I have. It’s full of fatuous made up bollocks.
Reads one article and thinks she's Carl Sagan. What a plonker.
She really is so appalling. It must be so exhausting to deliberately be so fact-free.
I have. And your entire argument against the collective works of hundreds of climate scientists appears to be “Thomas Malthus was wrong 200 years ago, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ...”
Here’s a scientist that doesn’t believe in climate change @Piers_Corbyn
But the point isn’t to pick whichever scientist who has views that suit your own. It’s to listen to what the vast majority of scientists are saying about the weight of evidence.
Science > Julia David Attenborough > Julia Nasa > Julia UNFCCC > Julia Extinction Rebelion > Julia Pond Life > Julia This is my opinion on the matter!pic.twitter.com/jWwgWVdVJC
Call it ad hominem if you will, but I expect the article would be more informative if I wiped my arse with it.
At least it might serve some use that way . . .
Yes, and leaving aside poor grammar, far better to wake in the morning wondering how to save the planet than to wake not giving a damn.
lmao expecting people to read the express
The whole article is just "this isn't happening because life expectancy is higher then during the 1700's". Like, thats it. It's quite amazing really.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.