Morning. I’ve written this for today’s Sunday Express about Harry and Meghan’s two-child nonsense.pic.twitter.com/frVHN72r1G
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Julia appears to think advances in medical science will save us from the effects of climate change. Having spent 42 years in medical science, no it won’t.
I don't know... There is research into animal-human hybrids. Inject a few camel genes into humans so we can live in desert conditions with little water - job done! The humps may take getting used to but....
You open by dismissing the entire global scientific community as having as much value as a random nutter with a sandwich board. Why on Earth would anyone with half a brain continue to read the rest?
'The claims of the IPCC are dangerous, unscientific nonsense' Dr Vincent Gray, climate researcher. Gray was an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990, author of more than 100 scientific publicationshttps://www.climatedepot.com/2013/08/21/un-scientists-who-have-turned-on-unipcc-man-made-climate-fears-a-climate-depot-flashback-report/ …
Have you, Julia?
Yawn. You make a living out of writing provocative stuff. But one thing that a month away from Twitter reminded me is that it’s tiresome. Enjoy the reaction you’ve got (the actual point of the article).
did you try reading it back to yourself? because if you had, before you’d hit send, some still-sentient part of you would’ve died of shame and mortification at its puerile ignorance
I’ve read it. It’s complete twaddle.
DA in New Scientist: On climate change we cannot be radical enough. JHB in the bloody Sunday Express:.... eco-lunatics....who insist we only have a few years to save the planet..... Only one of them speaks irresponsible nonsense.....
Yes. Your point?
You keep asking that question and people keep telling they have and it’s still shit. Maybe they have a point?
You're a talkshow host. You provide confirmation bias for your audience, not anything anyone should take seriously.
Have you read your own article? Because it's shit.
Julia, no point in repeating this stock response, they have read it. Point is the article contains no scientific facts about global warming and climate change trends...so they are on pretty firm ground in their rebuttals.
We've all read it. It's still tripe.
No. I don't need to. I'd rather get my information from the likes of PROFESSOR @ProfBrianCox, and not some right wing hack.
Yes we've all read your article. It's a two minute read... Have you read the IPCC report the Greta Thunberg requests her audiences to read? Unfortunately as it is a work of actual scientific research it will probably take you more than 2 mins.
Yes and my favourite bit is you in depth reasoning for global population growth: 1) medical advances mean fewer people are dying. 2) medical advances mean fewer people are dying. 3) fewer people are dying.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.