I know that you make a living being deliberately provocative, but this is criminal. Some people will believe this nonsense, at a time when all of us should be trying to reduce climate change. Do you have a science degree? How can you be so foolish?
-
-
-
Have you read the article?
-
Julia appears to think advances in medical science will save us from the effects of climate change. Having spent 42 years in medical science, no it won’t.
-
I don't know... There is research into animal-human hybrids. Inject a few camel genes into humans so we can live in desert conditions with little water - job done! The humps may take getting used to but....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And I just wiped my arse on it!!
#RacistRag Daily Mail sacked you for being too much of a liability or Express willing to pay your tax dodging off shore company? -
I’m guessing facts aren’t a big thing in your life but I’ve never worked for the Daily Mail, I’ve never been sacked from any job and I don’t have a tax dodging off shore company. But apart from that, well done for a great tweet!
-
#PrayForBrian who lives in France
-
Ha ha ha ha ha ha
-
Still I sleep at night Julia, not having to spew hate and division to prostitute a living, apart from that what else can you do?
-
Why so bitter Brian?
-
Because he’s aware that he could never get someone like JHB to sleep with him.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The human population has almost doubled in our lifetime, this is irresponsible journalism.
-
Yes, and isn’t that WONDERFUL? All those babies not dying from malnutrition, all those people living past 35 and into their 70s? All those people who no longer die of preventable diseases, starvation and poverty? You should be thrilled. I am.
-
Not really. Frankly it’s terrifying. You seem to think death is something unnatural
-
This documentary on the BBC by
@HansRosling is quite enlightening re over population.https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/overpopulated-bbc/amp/ … -
Sure if your only consideration is Human well-being. Makes no leeway for wildlife or conservation of other species. This human-centric approach is arrogant and short sighted imo
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Attenborough or Hartley-Brewer..........Attenborough or Hartley-Brewer. I won’t lie it’s a tough one Call me old fashioned but I think I’ll go with the respected expert on this one if it’s ok with you
-
Have you read the actual article ?
-
I have. It's offensive dross. What a surprise!
-
Minor detail but she doesn’t seem to have referred to any science.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.