This is typical of the lefts burning of books. Rather than challenge what they don't agree with, silence it, vilify it, and if necessary remove it from society. Internment will soon be the lefts answer to dissenters.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's mainly the cowardice of the institutions who are firing these people. Don't tell me that word 'racist' has lost all its power thorough overuse. It's how the far-left win every time. If it didn't work, they would not use it.
-
It doesn't work anymore. These thickos think it does. Look to Lammy, Little Owen et al do you take any notice? I don't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sadly we live in a society dominated by the vocal minority at the expense of the silent majority.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
For once, and ONLY once I agree with you. This is disgraceful behaviour. Its just pandering to middle-class 'woke'ness'
-
No, it's cultural Marxism. It's a clever way of shutting down opinions leftists don't like. We've got hordes of brainwashed student activists to contend with thanks to the infiltration of our education system, especially Uni's.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It started at the schools. Cultural Marxism grabbed hold & now universities are lost; two generations of indoctrinated activists are quite rightly angry, but will have to see for themselves to truly comprehend. Some very dark days are coming for those without suitable insulation.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
'This is McCarthyism'. No, it's neo-Marxism.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
The contention is that his research tries to find correlations between race and intelligence but they claim it's flawed statistically. Wouldn't it be better to rebut his research than get him fired? I.e. win the arguement?
-
Agreed. It's also a bit curious we have little difficulty accepting races have different physical attributes but find in appalling They May have different mental ones.
-
Ah, but to address that issue would mean challenging ideological orthodoxy!
-
But even still, here's why it isn't even possible to rebut the arguments. You cannot rebut arguments that weren't actually based on any data.https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/05/noah-carls-only-crime-is-being-a-conservative/ …
-
Will download one of the papers. They are peer reviewed so doubt they have NO data.
-
If you think more than a couple of people who signed the list actually read any of his papers and that their concerns were based on actual facts, you haven't been paying much attention to where this all started. Evidence doesn't often matter to the mob.
-
I'm pretty sure that's likely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.