As you've proven, time and time again, you don't have to be clever to be get air time.
-
-
-
You don’t, but it helps.
-
Why on earth do you think I missed your point? *shrugs*
-
Thick as mince?
-
love it when those who cannot debate resort to insult. Eh Martin?
-
She *literally* started this whole thread with an insult!
-
An observation. Not an insult.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Want to talk justification? How can MPs justify claiming £115,353,420.77 in expenses..that is on top of their salaries!! They just aren’t worth the money.pic.twitter.com/N3Cpl6CYA7
-
New conversation -
-
-
She has a point. Farage was supposed to represent us on fisheries in european parliament. He went to 1/42 meetings on the subject. Hardly doing the job for which he was paid!! He had powers of control he failed to use. That is why we need to elect MEP's who do their job for us!
-
He had one 28th of this so called power. He will now be paid like the other 750 MEPs who get paid(£100,000 I believe) plus their pensions. If OUR government had honoured the result of the ref we would be out and Nigel would be out of a job and then EU could pay for themselves.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
It may just be that she was even more “inexpensively educated” than you, Yulia. Either way, her question was better than your answer !
-
Grauniad spelling there. He was editor at some point .
-
The joke’s on you, Nick. I can’t be bothered to explain
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course. Remain parties should be allowed to stand unchallenged and thereby prove Country is 100% Remain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She just doesn't get it. Sad, really.
-
The frightening part is not the ignorance of the question, but the fact there's a "QC" after her name.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
