Julia, do you still believe there is no evidence that people are affecting climate change ?
-
-
-
I’ve never said that!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How does he know he won’t be knocked down by a bus tomorrow or live to be 105? Nobody has proved to me that the World is about to end any time soon
-
All I can say is the below..... Same .hit different year (2007).pic.twitter.com/xBzkun5pbJ
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A very good journalistic exposè on Extinction Rebellion can be found here http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/04/24/rebellion-extinction-a-capitalist-scam-to-hijack-our-resistance/ … And for those who want to know more about Greta Thunberghttp://www.theartofannihilation.com/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-political-economy-of-the-non-profit-industrial-complex/ …
-
The same Corporates who are steering the public from what we should be discussing.. Controlled opposition to stop others talking about Geo engineering... 5G and Fracking.... and the role HAARP plays in affecting the climate...
-
ER & many other environmental groups are co-opted into the Agenda21 Sustainable Development program or ICLEI as it's sometimes known locally... it's a worldwide system that's taking control of all resources..5G, HAARP, Smart Meters etc all link back to ithttps://youtu.be/rpLaLjeC1WU
-
And Which Magazine.. Meant to look after consumers ....Pushing the roll out of smart meters... https://cla.auburn.edu/envirolitigators/introduction-to-the-enviro-litigators/law/concepts-and-processes/the-precautionary-principle-and-the-new-burden-of-proof-the-vellore-case1/ …pic.twitter.com/EAw5cHzTVd
-
Yes.. I've come across that phrase before "Precautionary Principle" it's cleverly used to bypass the notion that MAJOR changes to society should be evidence based...as there is no actual evidence the Precautionary Principle fools the public into coerced acceptance...
-
It is meant to protect.... In one document it read that where scientists disagree on the effect of a harmful toxin ... it should not deter from the victim receiving justice...
-
As you say it's meant to protect...within the AGW debate there is no actual evidence, all they have is computer modelling so many scientists are fence sitting... therefore they use Precautionary Principle to promote their Agenda...which will ultimately have a devastating effect..
-
But use it to their advantage when protecting themselves as seen in the UN video relating to 5G
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would appreciate being put in touch with him as apparently he is able to predict the date of his death.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Years ago these nutters would have been locked away now we give them attention. They keep making stats up. 60% of nature has been destroyed? What does that mean? Where is that proven?
-
Obviously by that he means building houses/cities . Ffs were a growing world!! He should be campaigning for 1 child per family like China if that's his issue?!?!? I bet he has a few grandkids? Do they want to live in the woods when they grow up??
#justsaying -
Well there you go, every days a school thanks for education lesson, but you get my point... We are a growing planet so obvz going to need more space to live?? Yes so we need to expand into green/brown belt lands or build in the sky??? So at a result nature will be affected...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He is saying 60% of nature has been destroyed that is really a nonsensical figure
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Show your work." If he believes these things surely he can back them up with solid research..........
-
Well, we can save 90% of nature if we sacrifice this guy to the volcano, sooooo ....
-
Remember, back in the day, when it was, "If we can save one child...."?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.